Recent History
January 10, 1933
Ten Lessons on Meat for Use in Schools
Meat is one of the most important foods. It is usually the item around which the balanced meal is built. In studying the composition and the chemical constituents of meat, the role it plays in the diet will be understood.
Meat as a Food
Meat is one of the most important foods. It is usually the item around which the balanced meal is built. In studying the composition and the chemical constituents of meat, the role it plays in the diet will be understood.
Protein.
Meat is undoubtedly the most widely used of all animal proteins. This use of meat as a source of protein is scientifically sound because of the high biological value of its protein. The belief is no longer held that proteins from whatever source are of equal value in the diet.
Dr. H. H. Mitchell makes this point clear in the following statement: "Even vegetable foods such as dried (navy) beans and cocoa, which are relatively rich in crude protein are unimportant as sources of protein in nutrition because of the enormous losses of nitrogen in the course of their utilization in digestion, or in metabolism, or both. Their high content of protein is deceptive and the conclusion that such foods are 'meat substitutes/ though frequently stated, must be considered erroneous. "Among the animal foods it is evident that meats and meat products are preeminent as sources of protein. Although the biological value of animal tissue proteins (nitrogen) is appreciably lower than those of eggs or of milk, the higher content of protein in animal tissues, either on the fresh or dry basis, offsets or more than offsets their greater losses in metabolism.''1
McCollum and Simmonds emphasize the same point: "It is surprising that proteins of all peas and beans are of low biological value. This means that they are not well utilized when they form the sole source of protein in the diet. This fact compels a revision of views formerly held concerning the importance of seeds of the leguminous plants. A few years ago it was generally taught that peas and beans were excellent substitutes for meats. . . . Proteins from one source, rich in certain digestion products which were furnished in but small amounts by proteins from another source might be combined, and each protein would enhance the value of the other. Unfortunately, the proteins of peas, beans and soy beans do not enhance to any marked degree the quality of the cereal grain proteins. In this respect these proteins are distinctly inferior to meat proteins."2
Dr. Casimer Funk and Dr. Benjamin Harrow make the following statement about the use of meat as protein food: "Meat is the most popular protein food, but at the same time contains other food constituents. We find proteins in peas, beans, and cereals, though as a rule the proteins found in the plant world are not as 'complete' as those found in the animal world. This is a strong argument against the adoption of a strictly vegetarian diet."3
A survey of Table 3 will disclose the marked superiority of animal foods over vegetable foods as sources of protein. Another angle from which protein study is approached is the supplementary relations which exist between proteins from different sources. Proteins with the same amino-acid deficiencies will not supplement each other. Proteins from meats are decidedly valuable in enhancing the proteins of the cereal grains. This is due not only to the fact that meats and cereal grains do not have the same amino-acid deficiencies but also to the fact that the proteins from both of these sources are highly assimilable.
Fat.
Fat is a valuable constituent of food. It is used in the body to form fatty tissue and to furnish energy. Fat has a greater fuel value than any other food constituent. One pound of fat will yield two and one-fourth times as much heat as do proteins or carbohydrates. Meats, especially the fat meats, such as bacon and salt pork, are splendid energy foods.
January 11, 1933
Ten Lessons on Meat - For Use in Schools
"It seems fair, then, to conclude that the earlier estimates of man's protein needs were approximately correct, and that to enjoy sustained vigor and to experience his normal expectancy, man must eat a liberal quantity of good protein. By good is meant proteins of protein mixtures which are of high biologic value, in which the proteins of meat or milk, preferably both, find first place."
EARLY in the history of the science of nutrition meat was regarded just as one of the several protein foods. As knowledge of protein values increased greater stress was placed on the fact that animal proteins, namely, meat, milk, eggs, and cheese must be differentiated from vegetable proteins because of the higher biologic value of the former class of proteins. You learned this in Lesson One; also that meat is an excellent source of two essential minerals, iron and phosphorus; that meat contains copper; that meat furnishes energy; and that meat is a source of vitamins, especially the glandular tissue. Lesson Nine presents some of the more recent findings of research on the value of meat in the diet.
Meat in the Normal Diet
Protein requirement.
The question of minimum and optimum protein intake has long been a battleground in the science of nutrition. There is a wide difference of opinion concerning the minimum amount of protein which will maintain health and vigor, although the higher protein standard is more generally accepted. The human race instinctively has chosen the high level of protein intake. Voit, a pioneer in the field, concluded from observation of the amount of protein taken by persons generally that 118 grams was the proper amount for the average man engaged in ordinary activities. Atwater advocated about the same amount, 120 grams. This estimate was generally accepted.
Chittenden, from experiments on himself and a group of students and soldiers, concluded that the accepted protein intake was too high and that about 50 grams daily will assure the best results. McCollum favors a more liberal allowance and points out that Chittenden's experiment represented too short a part of the life span to be conclusive. Muller tells of the decrease in mental and body efficiency and decreased resistance to disease which was experienced in Germany during the war, when one of the chief characteristics of the war-time ration was protein deprivation. McLester sums up the discussion of the relative value of high and low protein diets:
"Thus it would appear that the terms optimum and minimum as applied to diet are not synonymous, and that the smallest permissible intake is not necessarily the best. Meltzer understood this when he said that as an engineer adds the factor of safety when he builds a bridge, a similar factor should be added in the diet. We may be able to get along happily and well, at least for a time, on a minimal protein intake, but the diet which promises the greatest insurance against decay and disease is the one which carries with it a liberal factor of safety. This is the optimum diet.
"It seems fair, then, to conclude that the earlier estimates of man's protein needs were approximately correct, and that to enjoy sustained vigor and to experience his normal expectancy, man must eat a liberal quantity of good protein. By liberal is meant an amount in excess of his theoretic needs, such an amount as the race, in its long experience, has instinctively chosen—say, 100 grams daily, more or less. By good is meant proteins of protein mixtures which are of high biologic value, in which the proteins of meat or milk, preferably both, find first place."*
January 12, 1933
Ten Lessons on Meat - For use in schools
"The diet which is strictly vegetarian will practically always be of relatively low protein content. The addition of even small amounts of meat, even of the muscle variety, will be very valuable when such a regimen is adhered to."
Value of a mixed diet.
The question of a mixed diet versus the vegetarian diet revolves around the amount and kind of protein which most adequately meets body needs. From earliest times man has thrived on a mixed diet. Nature has equipped him to do so. The kind of teeth and the nature of his digestive apparatus clearly indicate the suitability of a mixed diet. Regarding the value of a mixed diet, McCollum says: "In general, a vegetable diet will be markedly improved by the inclusion of muscle tissue meat, and more so by the addition of the glandular organs, but even these features of the subject are not from the standpoint of good nutrition the most important. It is scarcely practicable for man to eat enough leafy foods to enable him to succeed with the strictly vegetable diet. The limiting factor is the amount of leafy food which can be consumed."1
Vegetarian diet.
It is possible to live on a strictly vegetarian diet but it is not easy to do so and maintain the body in the highest degree of efficiency. It is often shown that the so-called vegetarian diet is supplemented with animal protein in the form of milk and eggs. McCollum says: "The diet which is strictly vegetarian will practically always be of relatively low protein content. The addition of even small amounts of meat, even of the muscle variety, will be very valuable when such a regimen is adhered to. Eggs, because of their relative richness in fat-soluble A and water-soluble B, will be even more effective supplements, and the same statement will apply to the consumption of small amounts of glandular tissue. Even small amounts of foods of animal origin will tend, therefore, to enhance the diet of one who is forced by economic reasons, rather than by ethical reasons, to subsist in the main upon vegetable foods. In another connection we shall present data showing that a diet too low in protein or in which the proteins are of a poor quality, exerts very deleterious effects upon experimental animals." 2
The objection of vegetarians to a meat diet are not valid, as one writer points out: "History does not indicate that the eating of meat has the debasing effect, physical or moral as feared by them (vegetarians). The most vigorous, intellectual and highly civilized people the world has known have eaten meat."3
1 MCCOLLUM, E. V., The Newer Knowledge of Nutrition, 2nd edition.
2 , The Newer Knowledge of Nutrition, 2nd edition.
3 MCLESTER, JAMES S. , Nutrition and Diet in Health and Disease.
January 15, 1933
Ten Lessons on Meat for use in School
"At the beginning of the second year small servings of tender meat—beef, chicken, lamb, or liver, boiled, broiled, or roasted, and finely minced should be given at least three times a week. By the time the child is eighteen months old he may have meat or fish every day."
Meat in the diet of the child.
The growing child has a greater "protein requirement" than an adult, because of constantly building new tissue and wearing out old. There are the same good reasons for using meat as the source of protein in the diet of the child as in the diet of the grown-up.
Liver is used with excellent results in child feeding. In the first place, the protein of liver is of high biologic value and it is relatively free from connective tissue; in the second place, it is a good source of vitamins; and in the third place, it is rich in iron. In regard to vitamins, liver is given as an excellent source of vitamins A and G; a good source of vitamin B; and vitamins C and D are present. Bacon, because it is so easily digested, is one of the first meats to be given to the very young child. In planning the diet of the child, it must be borne in mind that the "protein requirement" should be met with protein of high biologic value, and the animal proteins—meat, milk, cheese, and eggs—fall in this class.
A publication from the Children's Bureau, United States Department of Labor, makes the following statement regarding meat in the diet of the pre-school child:
"Meat and fish supply valuable proteins, minerals, and vitamins. At the beginning of the second year small servings of tender meat—beef, chicken, lamb, or liver, boiled, broiled, or roasted, and finely minced should be given at least three times a week. By the time the child is eighteen months old he may have meat or fish every day. As the child's ability to chew increases, he may be given larger pieces of meat, but it always must be tender. Veal, ham, or pork, properly cooked, may be given to the child over four."3
Meat in reproduction and lactation.
In recent animal experimentation4 it has been found that reproduction and lactation were improved by the addition of a meat supplement to a wheat-milk diet. The rate of growth and the general vigor of the young of the meat fed animals were greater than in the control group. Experiments of this nature are of considerable significance in human nutrition.
January 16, 1933
Ten Lessons on Meat - for use in schools
"Pellagra is a disease which occurs in areas where the diet is lacking in fresh meats, milk, eggs, and leafy vegetables."
Meat and pellagra.
Pellagra is a disease which occurs in areas where the diet is lacking in fresh meats, milk, eggs, and leafy vegetables. An adequate diet is the only effective method of prevention and cure of this disease. In early studies of this disease the cause was attributed to lack of sufficient protein of good biological value. The preventive action of fresh beef, which furnishes excellent protein, no doubt was responsible for this conclusion drawn by the late Dr. Goldberger and his co-workers.
Further study by these workers in which a larger intake of protein in the form of casein failed completely to prevent the disease demonstrated that the potency of the beef was not due entirely to its protein. The results of such experiments have been interpreted as indicating that an unrecognized dietary essential is concerned with the prevention of pellagra.
This factor, designated as P-P, according to these workers, might be effective with little or possibly no cooperation from the protein factor. The pellagra-preventive activity of yeast extract gave further evidence of the existence of this factor P-P. [65]
Later studies associated pellagra-preventive factor P-P with vitamin B and revealed the multiple nature of vitamin B. Factor P-P, now designated vitamin G of the vitamin B complex, is contained in dried lean beef. Its presence in dried beefsteak and liver also has been demonstrated. The work of Hoagland and Snider has shown its presence in several dried tissues of beef, pork, and lamb. Eecent work by Sherman and Derbigny1 points to the possibility that both protein shortage and vitamin G deficiency may be concerned in the development of pellagra-like symptoms. They say: "In so far as the symptoms of shortage of vitamin G are regarded as pellagralike, such a vitamin theory of the disease should not preclude recognition of the possibility that the protein supply may also have a significant bearing on the pellagra problem."
Day2 reports determinations of vitamin G in fresh tissues of beef and veal. This work found beef heart to be three times as potent as beef round steak; beef kidney 8-10 times; beef liver 10 times; veal round steak showed slightly higher concentration of vitamin G than beef round, and veal liver and kidney were about the same as beef kidney.
From this study, as well as others, the potency of the glandular organs is shown to be higher in vitamin G content than the muscle tissues. When a diet consisting largely of salt pork and starchy foods is changed to one in which lean meats, milk and legumes are abundant, pellagra disappears.
Ancient History
Luxor, Luxor City, Luxor, Luxor Governorate, Egypt
5500
B.C.E.
Diet of ancient Egyptians inferred from stable isotope systematics
Ancient Egyptians have isotope values that show they're mostly plant-based with not much animal protein in their diet.
Highlights
• Carbonate δ13C was measured in tooth enamel and bone of Ancient Egyptians.
• δ13C remains largely constant from 5500 to 2000 BP and indicates very low C4-intake.
• High δ15N of mummy hair is indicative of aridity and not of trophic level.
• δ13C of hair indicates <50% of dietary protein came from animals.
• Sulfur isotopes suggest that fish, such as the Nile Perch, was not regularly consumed.
Abstract
Carbon, nitrogen and sulfur stable isotope compositions were measured in hard and soft tissues from Egyptian mummies of humans and animals in order to track the diet of ancient Egyptians from 5500 to 1500 years B.P. The carbon isotope ratios of bone apatite (δ13Cbo = −14.3 ± 0.9‰) and hair protein (δ13Ch = −19.9‰) are compatible with a diet based almost exclusively on C3-derived food (proportion of C4 < 10%). Less negative carbon isotope ratios of enamel (δ13Cen = −11.6 ± 0.7‰) relative to bones from the same mummies could be the result of differences in the chemical microenvironment in which mineralization occurred, as well as of differences in diet between children and adults, in particular through the consumption of milk or millet gruel during infancy and childhood. High values of nitrogen isotope ratios for hair protein (δ15Nh = 9.1‰–15.5‰) are ascribed to aridity rather than fish consumption because the δ34S values of human hair are lower than those measured in Nile perch scales. Except for Coptic mummies, the constancy of δ13Cbo and δ13Cen over a duration of ∼3000 years is striking considering the various political, technological, and cultural changes that impacted the Egyptian civilization during this time interval.
Carbon isotope ratios were measured in enamel, bone, and hair of ancient Egyptians.
A significant offset (+2.5‰) is observed between the 13C values of teeth and bones that
cannot be ascribed to the weaning effect. Following Warinner and Tuross (2009), this isotopic
offset rather may be caused by differences in mineralization conditions of the two types of
tissue. Using tissue-specific equations, the 13C value of the reconstructed diet is comparable and close to the average value of C3-plants (-25‰). 13C values of hair from ancient
with previous studies (Iacumin et al., 1996; Thompson et al., 2005).
Egyptians also suggest that C4-derived foods were rare in the diet (<10%), a result consistent
proportion of protein of animal origin may have reached 50%. Both estimates are lower than
Sulfur isotope ratios of mummy hairs further indicate that freshwater fish, such as the Nile
Carbon isotope ratios in mineralized tissues are constant throughout the studied period, indicating a preference for C3-derived food throughout the investigated time span. This is a surprising result given that C4 plants are better suited to arid environments, and that the climate became increasingly arid during this period (Touzeau et al., 2013). Coptic mummies have 13C values slightly lower than other mummies, possibly as a result of the introduction of olive oil during the Roman Period.
Assessing the consumption of animal products is difficult because the 15N of soft tissues, such as hair, is controlled by parameters other than diet, and in particular by the prevailing hydric stress. Using the carbon isotope ratios of mummy hairs, the contribution of animal protein to the total dietary protein was estimated here at 29±19%, corresponding to an ovo-lacto-vegetarian diet. Taking into account potential biases in the diet reconstruction, the
the average value of 64% characterizing modern omnivorous Europeans (Petzke et al., 2005).
perch, was not consumed in significant proportions.







